On a spring day in the year 1996, a lone gunman armed with rapid-fire weapons took the lives of 35 people in the historic site of Port Arthur.
That national tragedy nearly a generation ago, which sparked some of the most stringent firearm regulations in the world, can feel like a distant memory for many citizens.
However, the Bondi Beach attack this past Sunday, which left 15 dead, has brought back painful recollections of the Tasmanian tragedy.
A study released earlier this year revealed that there are now in excess of four million weapons owned by civilians across the country – a figure that is nearly twice the amount from about 20 years ago.
This means approximately one firearm per seven citizens.
While Queensland has the highest number of legal firearms, followed by NSW and Victoria, it is Tasmania and the Northern Territory that have the most guns per person.
The data also dispels the widespread belief that guns are primarily held by people in regional areas.
Weapons are common in metropolitan and suburban areas, with a large share located in population centres.
Critically, there are now firearms concentrated among fewer owners, with the typical gun owner possessing over four firearms.
Gun control laws in Australia are not uniform across the country, with a mixed implementation of rules across states and territories.
Broadly speaking, to secure a gun licence, an individual must be over 18, deemed a "responsible individual", pass a safety program, and provide a "valid purpose" for ownership.
The accepted reasons include hunting or culling, marksmanship, certain professional duties, and as a hobby.
However, significant gaps remain. For instance, individuals under 18 in some states can have use of a firearm from as young as 10 or 12 years old.
Following the Port Arthur massacre, a comprehensive reform of national gun laws was enacted, leading to a massive buyback of over 650,000 firearms.
Rapid-fire weapons were banned, and security screenings alongside delays for sales were introduced.
A key tenet of these reforms was the rejection of "personal protection" as a acceptable grounds for gun ownership.
In the wake the Bondi shooting, political leaders were unequivocal about the need to bolster gun laws.
A national gun buyback scheme was announced, marking the most significant such effort since 1996.
Other planned reforms now under consideration include:
There are also calls for regular reviews of existing licence holders, acknowledging that "people's circumstances can change" over time.
These proposed changes have sparked debate from some quarters.
Pro-gun advocates argue that imposing caps would not have prevented an attack driven by extremist ideology.
They suggest that resources would be better spent combating radicalisation rather than tightening regulations for the overwhelming number of law-abiding citizens.
Furthermore, a long-promised reform from 1996 – a national firearms register – remains not yet operational, though it has now been listed as a urgent task.
For campaigners, the Bondi attack is a tragic indication that regulations must evolve with new threats.
They argue that strengthening is needed to "remain effective" and safeguard communities.
While mass shootings remain uncommon in Australia compared to some nations, the risk persists, and the ongoing issue of guns in the wrong hands – through black markets – continues to pose a danger.
As one advocate noted, "It's sad that it requires such a devastating event to get people to wake up and pay heed."
A passionate gambling analyst with over a decade of experience in reviewing online casinos and slot games across Europe.